Skip to content

Catching up ServiceStack.Logging to 3.9.48#18

Merged
mythz merged 1 commit into
ServiceStackV3:masterfrom
bchavez:master
May 30, 2013
Merged

Catching up ServiceStack.Logging to 3.9.48#18
mythz merged 1 commit into
ServiceStackV3:masterfrom
bchavez:master

Conversation

@bchavez

@bchavez bchavez commented May 30, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previous NuGet linked to 3.9.44, which caused build errors in Mono when ServiceStack.* head version is 3.9.48.

This pull requests catches up the lagging 3.9.44 NuGet packages to 3.9.48.

See this problem on StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16784739/new-to-c-mono-servicestack-redis-cannot-find-reference/16843995

I think we need some synchronized releases with _all_ ServiceStack packages; otherwise, we start leaving the Mono people behind.

The problem

Steps to reproduce the problem

  • ServiceStack.Logging.NLog is compiled against 3.9.44 on NuGet
  • The head version is of ServiceStack.* is 3.9.48.
  1. You download NuGet ServiceStack 3.9.48
  2. You download NuGet ServiceStack.Logging.NLog which is compiled against 3.9.44

When building using xbuild on Mono will produce the following:

Errors:

/root/tmp/MyProject/Source/MyProject.sln (default targets) ->
(Build target) ->
/root/tmp/MyProject/Source/MyProject.Server/MyProject.Server.csproj (default targets) ->
/usr/lib/mono/4.0/Microsoft.CSharp.targets (CoreCompile target) ->

        Program.cs(47,83): error CS0234: The type or namespace name `NLogger' does not exist in the namespace `ServiceStack.Logging'. Are you missing an assembly reference?

Previous NuGet linked to 3.9.44, which caused build errors in mono.
mythz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2013
Catching up ServiceStack.Logging to 3.9.48
@mythz mythz merged commit 23481c4 into ServiceStackV3:master May 30, 2013
@mythz

mythz commented May 30, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cool thx Brian.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants