Drop support of Python 3.9 and adopt 3.12 instead

Python 3.9 reaches its "end of life" in October 2025. However, the "Scientific Python" community promotes a more eager support cycle. As of 5 April 2024, packages are recommended to drop Python 3.9 support. The latest release of numpy also supports Python 3.12, but we currently run no tests against this version of Python.

Does somebody have particular opinions on whether we should switch Python versions rather quickly or rather slowly?

Side note: On Euler, we are working with Python 3.10 already

Opinion: I would rather update quickly if it is possible, but probably not to the latest version always as other packages need to catch-up.

but probably not to the latest version always as other packages need to catch-up.

Completely agree!

Python 3.12 was released on 02 Oct 2023, so you can't really say we would be early adopters 😅

I'll give it a try in a new PR and see what the checks tell.

Python 3.12 requires upgrading either cfgrib or eccodes:

├─ cfgrib >=0.9.9,<0.9.10  is installable with the potential options
│  ├─ cfgrib 0.9.9.0 would require
│  │  └─ python-eccodes with the potential options
...
│  │     ├─ python-eccodes [1.6.1|1.7.0] would require
│  │     │  └─ eccodes >=2.31.0 , which can be installed;
...
│  └─ cfgrib 0.9.9.1 would require
│     └─ python-eccodes >=0.9.8 , which can be installed (as previously explained);
├─ eccodes >=2.27,<2.28  is not installable because it conflicts with any installable versions previously reported;

We would either need to lift the restriction on cfgrib or allow eccodes >=2.31. Both package restrictions are related to StormEurope, see #811

See https://github.com/CLIMADA-project/climada_python/actions/runs/8632858011/job/23664532641?pr=870

Actually it was even already decided at the last "climada days" to make the standard python version 3.10 . So no objections to drop python 3.9.

@ThomasRoosli

The dependency restrictions currently do not permit us to adopt Python 3.12. On the other hand, I see no point in dropping Python 3.9 support only for the sake of it. I suggest to keep things as they are for now and see if we progress with StormEurope within the next couple of weeks.

@ThomasRoosli, could you give us a time frame regarding any updates to the StormEurope module and especially its dependencies?

From #899: Maybe switch to Python 3.11 as recommended version right away? We are and will be using 3.11 on Euler, even after the Ubuntu transition

It looks to me that we can close this?

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Drop support of Python 3.9 and adopt 3.12 instead #868

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Drop support of Python 3.9 and adopt 3.12 instead #868

Description

Activity

peanutfun commented on Apr 10, 2024

chahank commented on Apr 10, 2024

spjuhel commented on Apr 10, 2024

peanutfun commented on Apr 10, 2024

peanutfun commented on Apr 10, 2024

emanuel-schmid commented on Apr 11, 2024

peanutfun commented on Apr 12, 2024

peanutfun commented on Jun 25, 2024

spjuhel commented on Apr 3, 2025

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions